Los story 1: Well, Well, Well,
BOTH the WhistleBlower Complaint and the transcript is out. This triggered the Democraps to launch OFFICIAL IMPEACHMENT proceedings.
The WhistleBlower (WB) complaint wasn’t even public yet and the Democraps already began proceedings. But this isn’t the first talk of impeachment..
Clip of everyone in the past talking about impeachable offenses
So this complaint says Trump “PUSHED’” the Pres of Ukraine to “investigate Biden and his son” for political gain.
Weird how this is something that is wrong when youre trump, but totally fair game when you aren’t. CASE AND POINT:
Here are 3 US senators who sent a letter to the PM of Ukraine and ask to investigate trump’s actions, because they didn’t want to believe the Mueller report..
But the question here is DID TRUMP WITHHOLD MILITARY AID as a QUID PRO QUO?
“You know, Do this or you won’t get the dough..”
This Just isn’t the case. Let’s look at the ACTUAL released WB complaint.
In this document, you will find that this WB had NO DIRECT KNOWLEDGE of the conversation.
Over and over in this thing, he says that ”HE HEARD” or “HE LEARNED”
It is filled with opinions of those who he claims to have “learned this information” from.
But it also alleges that trump and his team tried to cover the transcript up.
“I learned from multiple US officials that senior WH officials had intervened to “ LOCK DOWN” all records of the phone call…”
Here’s the thing. HOW MANY PHONE CALLS HAVE BEEN LEAKED ALREADY?
A simple NON GOOGLE search of how many phone calls have been leak reveal that this is happening like crazy.
And reading the WB complaint you will read that WH officials can’t keep their mouths shut. Constantly blabbering to the press.
This has to be (in my opinion) so that foregin leaders will feel uncomfortable talking to Trump and ruin his ability for work on foreign affairs.
There, reasonable doubt on why he has to lock down convos.
What about the Biden thing?
Well, before this whole UNCLASSIFIED complaint came out, Trump authorized for the transcript to be released.
Now depending on how much TDS you have, this is a conversation between tony soprano and Pres Zelenskky
But nowhere in this transcript ( and yes it isn’t VERBATIM) but no where will you find him talking about holding on to AIDE in exchange for dirt.
He simply mentions biden and how it “ SOUNDS HORRIBLE TO ME”
The media goes crazy!
Here is how they read it on MSNBC
And here's another, altering the quote by starting the quote and skipping 500 words to fit their narrative.
How can anyone trust the media when they obviously alter and make up quotes like this?
So, The acting director of national intelligence testified in front of congress and during opening statements, Adam Schiff completely makes up quotes in order to paint a narrative
When pushed back about this Trump calls for his resignation, schiff says it was a “parody”
This is not a joke, he isn’t a comedian, this isn’t an open mic. This is a congressional hearing. This isn't acceptable.
Sure, he says “I would like you to do us a favor..” but that is referring to the ukraine servers that hacked into Hildawgs emails. He is simply asking to look into it. And only 500 words later (a whole page later) does he even mention biden and his son earning $50,000 a month for basically nothing. We should be suspicious of this.
And it’s not like this is unwarranted. Biden in 2016 bragged about the same EXACT THING that the folks on the left are putting on trump, WITHHOLDING AIDE QUID PRO QUO:
So we need to ask ourselves, what do we really know about this prosecutor that is “corrupt”?
Was he really looking into the energy company that biden son was on?
Did biden just want to help ukraine get rid of a “corrupt” prosecutor general?
Well according to the Hill.com
“(Biden) insists that, in spring 2016, he strong-armed Ukraine to fire its chief prosecutor solely because Biden believed that official was corrupt and inept, not because the Ukrainian was investigating a natural gas company, Burisma Holdings, that hired Biden's son, Hunter, into a lucrative job.
There’s just one problem.
Hundreds of pages of never-released memos and documents — many from inside the American team helping Burisma to stave off its legal troubles — conflict with Biden’s narrative.
And they raise the troubling prospect that U.S. officials may have painted a false picture in Ukraine that helped ease Burisma’s legal troubles and stop prosecutors’ plans to interview Hunter Biden during the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
For instance, Burisma’s American legal representatives met with Ukrainian officials just days after Biden forced the firing of the country’s chief prosecutor and offered “an apology for dissemination of false information by U.S. representatives and public figures” about the Ukrainian prosecutors, according to the Ukrainian government’s official memo of the meeting. The effort to secure that meeting began the same day the prosecutor's firing was announced.
In addition, Burisma’s American team offered to introduce Ukrainian prosecutors to Obama administration officials to make amends, according to that memo and the American legal team’s internal emails.
The memos raise troubling questions:
1.) If the Ukraine prosecutor’s firing involved only his alleged corruption and ineptitude, why did Burisma's American legal team refer to those allegations as “false information?"
2.) If the firing had nothing to do with the Burisma case, as Biden has adamantly claimed, why would Burisma’s American lawyers contact the replacement prosecutor within hours of the termination and urgently seek a meeting in Ukraine to discuss the case?
Meanwhile in clown world, anyone who thinks biden is innocent, believes a narrative that this was done out of the kindness of his heart.
But the former prosecutor says he didn’t see any wrongdoing: https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2019-09-29/former-ukraine-prosecutor-says-no-wrongdoing-biden
When asked about the matter, Former PM of Ukraine said
“I think it’s essential (he’s investigated),”
Here is a video that questions biden and his son and asks, “Did biden profit from this”
Either way, i found clips of Aunt Nancy at the clinton Impeachment hearings
And it is telling…https://youtu.be/pUtD5e4L9QU
Difference is, there is actual evidence clinton blew a load all over that blue dress.
I don’t care if Trump gets impeached. I don’t believe there’s any way one of the democraps running will win with the crap policies they are running on.
If trump is impeached in the house, the senate will not proceed. It’s a waste of our time and money. If you want him out. GET OUT THERE AND VOTE. in 2016, NEARLY HALF of Americans eligible to vote, DIDN’T.
It their fault, not yours or mine. I didn’t vote for him, but I will next time around because it’s not about the rude things he says. He’s a big american character with big flaws, I am willing to overlook those flaws if they are not threatening my FREEDOM and the CONSTITUTION. I am not in favor for a party who says this country has never been great, who believe in socialism and who want to change the 1st and 2nd amendment and therefore a threat to the constitution.. I’m just trying to defend my freedom. I don’t care about trump. He is just a man. A man who will die like all men die. I just want to live free and i want my children to live free
Jimmy 1: that’s all good but is Putin gonna let this all slide: https://news.yahoo.com/release-trump-putin-transcripts-needs-153506508.html
Los story 2:
Because no one gets jokes anymore… the OK symbol is now recognized as a hate symbol…
Question: what’s your take on this?
Jimmy story 2:
BREAK TIME: (Video or something)